According to legal documents, Angelina Jolie “damaged” her ex-husband Brad Pitt by selling her share in the vineyard she owned to the Russian oligarch.
Since Angelina (49) filed for divorce from Brad (56) in 2016, the co-stars Mr & Mrs Smith have been involved in several legal battles. She solved it in court to take care of her six children – Shiloh, Pax, Vivienne, Maddox, Zahara, and Knox – and now stands in front of her vineyard, Chateau Miraval SA, where she bought a controlling stake. . in 2008.
“The vineyard has become Pitt’s passion – and lucrative because Miraval, under Pitt’s leadership, has grown into a multimillion-dollar global company and one of the most respected rosé producers in the world,” Pitt’s legal claim, per. ET.
The country is located in the village of Correns in south-eastern France and has a house and vineyard, and the former couple bought it for EUR 25 million (GBP 20 875 500). Pitt’s lawyers claim that the company under his leadership has grown into an “international million-dollar success story.”
She admitted that Jolie had not “contributed” to the company’s success.
According to the lawsuit, Jolie sold her stake in a ghost factory based in Luxembourg, which was controlled by Russian oligarch Yuri Shefler, without Pitt’s medical knowledge.
However, in new legal documents, Brad’s Fight Club lawyers claim that under his leadership, the company has become a “multimillion-dollar international success story” while Angelina has not “contributed.”
Brad would contribute 60% of the purchase price, with the remaining 40% paid by actress Tomb Raider. In January 2021, Pitta will report his decision to sell to Shefler, saying he made a “painful decision with a heavy heart.”
However, in new legal documents, Brad’s Fight Club lawyers claim that under his leadership, the company has become a “multimillion-dollar international success story” while Angelina has not “contributed.” Brad would contribute 60% of the purchase price, with the remaining 40% paid by actress Tomb Raider. He tried at the California Supreme Court to make the sale of the vineyard unnecessary. The actor also demanded compensation “in the amount that will be proved in court”, which he wanted in the jury.
Also Read: ‘Andi Mack’ Actor Stoney Westmoreland Sentenced for 2 years in Minor Exploitation Case